Media & Education
BATS Magazine

Volume 38, Issue 1, 2019

Winds of Change

By Michelle Z. Donahue


As it enters its 15th year, a unique collaboration has gone all-in to solve the problem of bats and wind turbines

As easily as saying his name, Jim Lindsay can recite the exact time and date that would forever change his job as a wind company biologist: 11:15 a.m. on August 19, 2003.

Michael Schirmacher / Bat Conservation International

With NextEra Energy (and its subsidiary, Florida Power and Light), Lindsay was responsible for coordinating a series of mandatory wildlife fatality surveys at the company’s new Mountaineer Wind Energy Facility on Backbone Mountain in West Virginia. When it opened in 2002, Mountaineer was the first and largest commercial wind farm east of the Mississippi; at the time, there were widespread concerns that the facility’s 44 huge rotors would kill numerous raptors and migratory songbirds.

But when one of Lindsay’s technicians called from Mountaineer to report, two weeks ahead of schedule, it wasn’t about birds.

 

 “He said, ‘Hey, Jim, there’s a lot of dead bats up here,” Lindsay recounts. “And I said, what’s a lot—10, 15 animals? And he said to me, ‘No, more like hundreds.’”

Gathering Momentum

By December of the same year, Lindsay found himself in a curious confab at a barbecue joint in Austin, Texas. With him at the table were representatives from Bat Conservation International, several of Lindsay’s wind industry colleagues from other companies and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) senior biologist Alex Hoar. On the agenda: figuring out what to do about bats dying by the thousands at wind turbines.

“We all agreed we needed to jump on this and understand what was going on,” Lindsay says.

The ambitious idea that came out of the meeting was to pull together a broad coalition of partners from conservation, government and the wind industry. The partners would cooperate on a long-term mission to conduct rigorous scientific inquiry into bat fatalities at wind facilities, and work to come up with tangible, testable solutions. By early 2004, the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), U.S. Fish and Wildlife and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory had signed on as founding partners along with BCI—just months after the fateful Mountaineer call.

The Bats and Wind Energy Cooperative was born

Members gather at the 2018 BWEC meeting to discuss new technologies that may be
utilized to minimize bat mortality at wind project sites. 
Cris Hein / Bat Conservation International

“Up to that point, most of the focus had been on birds, and there just wasn’t much out there on bats,” says Ed Arnett, a conservation biologist who worked for BCI at the time. “We saw the need to have a strong science component, but with the integration of industry and other players who would need to be engaged in this if we were going to expect any real outcomes.”

Currently in its 15th year, the BWEC now includes the U.S. Geological Survey, the U.S. Department of Energy and the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, along with academia, government agencies, private industry and non-governmental organizations.

Building Trust

The new coalition started out with a raft of challenges. First and foremost was the need for deep mutual trust despite somewhat opposing goals: on one side, an organization concerned with wildlife conservation; on the other, industry partners beholden to certain economic performances.

And then there was the matter of unanswered questions.

What does wildlife activity look like before and after wind turbine construction? Can fatalities be accurately estimated and modeled prior to construction of a windfarm? How do bats use the landscape at different times of year, such as during migration? Are wind energy facilities having population-level effects for certain bat species, and if so, what are the long-term effects? Are there technologies that can be used to keep bats away from turbines? Are there ways to operate the turbines to reduce bat fatalities? And how can all of this be done in a way that doesn’t cause economic hardship on an otherwise low-impact, sustainable energy source?

Guided by an oversight committee with representatives of all the major players, the BWEC sets research priorities to answer these questions (and new ones, as they emerge) on a three-year cycle. A scientific advisory committee helps by advising and reviewing studies and development of research tools, and a technical advisory committee provides input on the practicality and possible impacts of proposed field research studies at operating wind facilities.

Principal investigators (pictures from left to right): Ed Arnett,
Manuela Huso and John Hayes inspect the study site. 
Michael Schirmacher / Bat Conservation International 

Early work included refining mortality monitoring protocols around wind turbines, installing radar systems and infrared night video systems to gather data on bats flying near the rotors of operating turbines. Several wind energy facilities agreed to participate in the first studies on “operational curtailment”—or limiting the rotation of turbine blades until wind levels reached a certain speed. During 2008–2009, BWEC-lead research demonstrated that by temporarily limiting turbine blade rotation during low-wind conditions, bat fatalities could be reduced by 44 to 93 percent and still allow for 99 percent of the electricity to be produced. More recent research suggest percent fatality reduction may vary by species and power loss by project.

“Operational curtailment has been a huge win,” says Mylea Bayless, BCI’s Senior Director of Network and Partnerships, who also serves on the BWEC oversight committee. “It’s effective, it’s scientifically credible, it’s been tested many times in many different places, and more importantly, it’s made its way into policy. To take something from literally nothing, where it was just people noticing bats are being killed, to coming up with an effective solution to reduce mortality—that’s a huge accomplishment.”

To date, with funding from more than 45 private, public and foundation donors, group collaborators have published 14 peer-reviewed journal articles (cited over 2,000 times), six book chapters, produced 28 peer-reviewed reports, made more than 100 presentations at professional meetings, and conducted eight technical workshops for industry and research partners. And a newly published open-source program, a USGS generalized fatality estimator called GenEST, is the most recent example of a BWEC-sponsored tool that’s expected to have a high degree of impact.

“The great strength of the BWEC is the diversity of stakeholders, and having everyone at the same table, working toward the same goal,” says Michael Schirmacher, Director of BCI’s Wind Energy Program and BWEC Program Coordinator. “That transparency and cooperation gives BWEC- generated products credibility among stakeholders.”

Pacing for the Future

“The idea of collaborative conservation and research that integrates with industry and diverse stakeholders —that is the way of the future,” says Arnett, who now works for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “The BWEC is now a proven model for how these kinds of collaborations can work. It’s difficult. But we’ve had successes others can learn from.”

Jeremy Bowman, Iberdrola windsmith, adjusts an acoustic deterrent device
on a wind turbine.  
Michael Baker / Bat Conservation International

Cris Hein, formerly BCI’s Wind Program Director and now at NREL, says that the ultimate goal is to develop strategies where bats and wind turbines can coexist. But for now, many questions remain.

Pressing areas of concern include the wildlife impacts of wind development in new areas— offshore, for example, or in the southeastern United States. Upcoming studies will also look at the impact of newer, larger turbine technology, as well as attempt to answer the stubborn question of why some bats seem to be attracted to the turbines. Researchers will continue to refine operational minimization and seek out clues for how landscape features may affect bat movement and behavior. Lindsay says he believes the day is not far away when turbines will be available with pre-installed ultrasonic bat deterrents.

The long-term collaboration is a natural product of BCI’s core mission of generating real solutions in the service of conservation, says Mike Daulton, BCI’s Executive Director. As the saying goes, success begets success, and the cooperative’s work continues.

“Who we are and how we approach the world are exemplified by the BWEC—we’re driven by our specialized expertise and sustained partnerships,” Daulton says. “And the fact that the BWEC can point to specific advancements is something to hang its hat on. It keeps people coming back to the table to keep working.”

 

All articles in this issue:

Stay up to date with BCI

Sign up and receive timely bat updates

BCI relies on the support of our amazing members around the world.

Our mission is to conserve the world’s bats and their ecosystems to ensure a healthy planet.

Please join us or donate so our work can continue.